Wednesday, May 26, 2010

华勇会督的回应信

以下乃华勇会督针对4间卫理公会在诗巫补选期间接受政府175万特别拨款的回应信(从某人的面子书上获得)。红色字体乃我的注释。

Per: Government Grants to Methodist Churches on the Eve of the Sibu By-Election, 16 May 2010


Warmest greetings in the Name of our Lord Jesus Christ!

Many of our church members are aware of the reports in the media that the government made grants to four Methodist churches in Sibu, on the eve of the recent Parliamentary by-election. I am informed that the grants came to a total of RM1.75 million. I have also received text messages and emails from our own pastors and members on the same issue, expressing concern and asking where the Methodist Church in Malaysia stands on this. In order to help our members not to become confused and anxious, I would like to say the following:

1. First, the giving of grants to religious bodies for the advancement of religion, as well as to other bodies like schools, etc., is a government responsibility. To receive such is a citizen’s right. After all, the money given is actually taxpayers’ money.
(是的,接受拨款并没有错,这从来不是主要争论)Indeed the problem in our country is that most of the money for religious bodies is usually given to one particular religious community, with relatively much smaller proportions given to other communities. (这也是事实)In so far as the money was given to the churches this time round, it can be said that the government is trying to right a past wrong. (这点我很保留,似乎有点天真)Further, the churches concerned never asked for the money. (这点似乎与其它资料有点冲突,据说,这笔拨款是教会早在补选之前就已经按照正常程序申请的)No one should therefore charge them with wrongdoing.

2. However, as the public at large has pointed out, the problem with the grants made in this instance is that of timing! They were given on the eve of a closely fought by-election and therefore perceived to be manipulative and highly questionable.
(是的,这是问题的核心)Some people have therefore urged the churches involved to return the money.

3. The Christian church is concerned about morality and politics. Nonetheless, it cannot take sides in party politics for various reasons, including the fact that there are Christians on both sides of the political divide. Furthermore, the church must also guard against being perceived as being used as a tool by political parties, whether those in government or those in opposition. In light of the above, rejecting the grants given by the government in this instance is not necessarily the solution, because it could be misinterpreted as a rejection of the government in favour of the opposition. Clearly we are caught in a delicate dilemma, which has been forced upon us. (是的,钱已经收了,在目前的政治氛围中,要退回的确有点为难,但总议会是否能给一些指引,免去未来教会继续陷入在两难的情况之下呢?教会是否可以拟定一个原则,公开呼吁政府不要在竞选期间给予拨款呢?况且,这是否抵触竞选法令,也仍旧存在着争议)

4. The Methodist Church in Malaysia respects the right of the leadership of the four churches to decide on what to do with the grants that have been given. At the same time, the General Conference Executive Council, which includes the Bishop and all the Presidents, will deliberate on this matter and advise the four churches concerned accordingly.

5. Meanwhile, I would like to urge all our pastors and members to refrain from making any comments on the matter so that it does not get blown out of proportion.
(希望这并不是封口令,而许多人也的确在等待教会明确的立场)Instead, let us take serious the words of our Lord Jesus in Mat 5: 16, which of particularly significant in our present context. ‘In the same way, let your light shine before all men, so that they may see your good works and give glory to your Father who is in heaven.’ (Amen)When we truly live in this manner, we will go a long way to fulfil our Quadrennium theme, ‘Spreading Scriptural Holiness, Transforming the Nation.’

May the peace of the Lord be with all of you!



Yours sincerely in Christ,

Bishop Hwa Yung

The Methodist Church in Malaysia
69 Jalan 5/31
46000 Petaling Jaya , Malaysia

11 comments:

水方人子 said...

会督处于两难之间的苦境,如此表达也情有可原;真正的立场应该是从众会友的身上表达出来。

Anonymous said...

任何bishop为了维护团体的利益和团结,也会这样说话.他在私底下,极可能不是这么想.

这是很好的机会,让大家体会到, 真理--话语--权力,之间的结构性关系.....

问谁又能看破!

愛丁堡.四十不惑 said...

Thanks for sharing this.

thepplway求真 said...

我只能以中文作为回应批评吴吉平弟兄的回应

请大家为了信仰的合一,一起讨论。

http://2thepplwaywp.blogspot.com/2010/05/blog-post_27.html

Perng Shyang Teng said...

水方,某会友的立场,相信你已经看到了,有喷饭或吐血吗?

因此,领袖的立场很重要,因为这将帮助并塑造会友的未来立场!

Perng Shyang Teng said...

求真,

是的,我也一样震惊,我在面子书说:“上帝所赐的“契机”并不是让我们拿到更多的钱,而是给我们一个机会申明立场。”可惜,我不认为这弟兄的回应有足够的智慧,并且也荣耀上帝!

水方人子 said...

这件事上,我蛮欣赏你诚实的回应。作为一位基督徒我也感受那份痛。
我想会督是有苦衷的,但他的回应其实反映了会众的各种声音,所以我之前这么说。

思问者 said...

喜欢这句:

领袖的立场很重要,因为这将帮助并塑造会友的未来立场!

如果他想说暧昧一点,那就要小心,不要给那些让人喷饭的人开绿灯,而不是把理智的会友再压扁半寸。

领袖本来就应该负更大的责任被更多的要求,而不是更少,要不然如何诠释大服侍小,强赋能弱?

思问

Tik Wah said...

从沙巴的深山野林走出来,才发现到外面的世界发生了这么多事。有朋友不断的追问,期望我做一些这个、那个。。。

我习惯的作法是:咨询当事人。所以,今天下午拨电给刚从南非回来的会督,寻求澄清,也问一些该问的问题。。。

大家稍微忍耐一下,也要相信卫理公会总议会执行理事会会给予更进一步、更清晰的说明与指示。

Perng Shyang Teng said...

我们也在期待更进一步的指引。

哇哈哈哈哈 said...

邀请大家来看这篇帖子:哇哈哈哈哈